Discovery, abstraction, and drafting tied to the firm's own work product. Every output is a draft a partner can mark up, not a wall of text to triage.
Discovery review with citations back to the document and the page, so the privilege call and the relevance call are made on the actual text, not on a summary of the text. Volume reviewed by the system, judgment kept by the lawyer.
Contract abstraction into the firm's own schema, not a vendor's. Deposition summaries written the way a senior associate at the firm would write them, drawn from the firm's prior summaries. Research that returns the case, the holding, and how the firm has read that case before.
Underneath it all sits a queryable database of the firm's prior work: the petitions, the briefs, the orders, the intake notes, the partner's marginalia. The firm's institutional knowledge becomes searchable in plain language, in a format the firm owns and can change.
An employment law boutique wanted a single intake and matter system. A NYC nonprofit family law practice handling Article 10 cases needed faster file review under deadline.